When an AI Calls, Who Should Answer?

2026-10-21 · Source: Insurance Thought Leadership

Summary in 3 Points • Meta's AI agent can now call insurers for quotes, creating challenges for carriers in handling these calls. • Only 29% of insurers use AI agents for end-to-end processes, indicating a significant gap in automation. • Surveys show 61% of claimants want a human to review every denial, highlighting the importance of human involvement. --- Meta's AI agent, Muse, can now call insurers to request quotes, presenting a dilemma for carriers on how to manage these interactions effectively. Insurers face the risk of either engaging with AI or potentially losing out on real customers if they hang up on AI calls. The challenge is compounded by the fact that only 29% of insurers currently employ AI for comprehensive processes, suggesting a considerable opportunity for improvement in operational efficiency. Surveys reveal that a significant portion of claimants, 61%, prefer human oversight on claim denials, indicating that while AI can streamline processes, human involvement remains crucial. This sentiment is echoed by decision-makers in the industry, where 85% believe AI can enhance customer trust, yet only 40% of policyholders share this view. As insurers navigate the integration of AI, maintaining transparency and ensuring human oversight will be vital for building customer confidence and improving service delivery. Insurers must adapt to AI interactions while ensuring human oversight, particularly in claims processes, to maintain customer trust and operational efficiency.

London market impact

Insurers must adapt to AI interactions while ensuring human oversight, particularly in claims processes, to maintain customer trust and operational efficiency.